JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 16, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Jose Elias Mendoza Maestre

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Sentencia T-518/03
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso
  • Término de tres días contados a partir de notificación de fallo
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sentencia T-518/03 proferida por la Sala Primera de Revisión de Tutela, como quiera que la solicitud fue recibida en esta Corporación después del vencimiento del término de ejecutoria de la sentencia cuya nulidad se pretende, es claro que ha sido formulada de manera extemporánea y por ello tendrá que rechazarse.

Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el senor Jose Elias Mendoza Maestre contra la sentencia T - 518 del 24 de junio de 2003, proferida por la Sala Primera de Revision de Tutela,
  2. Segundo. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.